Riverside Truck Rental Ltd v Lancashire County Council [2020] EWHC 1018 (TCC) (06 May 2020)
The claims were brought out of time because the claimant had knowledge of the grounds for challenge at the latest by 29 November 2019, when its tender was rejected. The court has power to extend time for breaches occurring at that date, but not for breaches relating to the form of the invitation to tender, which occurred earlier. The criteria for extension require a good reason, which was not established on the facts.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1018 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Riverside Truck Rental Limited; Defendant: Lancashire County Council; Interested Party: Monks Contractors Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Procurement and Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time to Bring Claims
- Outcome
- Applications for extension of time granted in part; claims relating to breaches at rejection decision may proceed, but claims relating to invitation to tender are out of time and cannot be extended.
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Procurement Challenges, Extension of Time, Tender Evaluation Criteria, Transparency and Equal Treatment, Judicial Review of Procurement Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Riverside Truck Rental Limited
Claimant
Lancashire County Council
Defendant
Monks Contractors Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Procurement and Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time to Bring Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the procurement claim and judicial review claim were brought within the statutory time limits
- 2 Whether the court has power to extend time for bringing claims under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015
- 3 Whether the criteria for extension of time are met in this case
Ratio Decidendi
The claims were brought out of time because the claimant had knowledge of the grounds for challenge at the latest by 29 November 2019, when its tender was rejected. The court has power to extend time for breaches occurring at that date, but not for breaches relating to the form of the invitation to tender, which occurred earlier. The criteria for extension require a good reason, which was not established on the facts.
Court Disposition
Applications for extension of time granted in part; claims relating to breaches at rejection decision may proceed, but claims relating to invitation to tender are out of time and cannot be extended.
Orders
- Extension of time granted for claims relating to rejection decision of 29 November 2019.
- No extension granted for claims relating to form of invitation to tender.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment