Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v PM & Ors
PM lacks capacity to make decisions regarding her delivery and it is in her best interests to undergo an elective Caesarean section under spinal block, with general anaesthetic authorized as a contingency if strictly necessary.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; First Respondent: PM; Second Respondent: Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust; Third Respondent: PZ
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted; elective Caesarean section authorized under spinal block with contingency for general anaesthetic.
- Legal Topics
- Capacity Assessment, Best Interests Decision, Medical Treatment Authorization
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Applicant
PM
First Respondent
Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust
Second Respondent
PZ
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether PM lacks capacity to conduct proceedings and make decisions regarding delivery mode
- 2 Whether it is in PM's best interests to undergo an elective Caesarean section with spinal block, with contingency for general anaesthetic
Ratio Decidendi
PM lacks capacity to make decisions regarding her delivery and it is in her best interests to undergo an elective Caesarean section under spinal block, with general anaesthetic authorized as a contingency if strictly necessary.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted; elective Caesarean section authorized under spinal block with contingency for general anaesthetic.
Orders
- Elective Caesarean section to be performed under spinal block.
- General anaesthetic authorized only if strictly necessary for safety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment