Kornhauser, R (on the application of) v Land Registry
An assured tenant occupying one flat in a building cannot, by virtue of that tenancy and occupation, require the Land Registry to register him as freehold owner of the whole property or register his tenancy as an interest, as such tenancies are excluded from registration and confer no such right under English law.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sebastian Kornhauser; Defendant: Land Registry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Permission refused
- Legal Topics
- Registration of Interests in Land, Assured Tenancy, Freehold Title, Overriding Interests, Proprietary Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sebastian Kornhauser
Claimant
Land Registry
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an assured tenant can require the Land Registry to register his interest or himself as freehold owner of the property
- 2 Whether the Land Registry's refusal to register the claimant's interest was lawful
- 3 Whether the claimant's tenancy confers any right to freehold title
Ratio Decidendi
An assured tenant occupying one flat in a building cannot, by virtue of that tenancy and occupation, require the Land Registry to register him as freehold owner of the whole property or register his tenancy as an interest, as such tenancies are excluded from registration and confer no such right under English law.
Court Disposition
Permission refused
Orders
- Permission to apply for judicial review is refused
- Claimant granted right to a transcript of the judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment