Explosive Learning Solutions Limited v Landmarc Support Services Limited
There is reason to believe the Claimant will be unable to pay the Defendant’s costs if ordered to do so, and it is just to make an order for security for costs, especially given the Defendant’s undertaking to stay or dismiss the counterclaim if the Claimant’s claim is dismissed for failure to provide security.
- Parties
- Claimant: Explosive Learning Solutions Limited; Defendant: Landmarc Support Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim and Counterclaim / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs granted
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Counterclaims, Contractual Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Explosive Learning Solutions Limited
Claimant
Landmarc Support Services Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim and Counterclaim / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant will be unable to pay the Defendant’s costs if ordered to do so
- 2 Whether it is just to make an order for security for costs given the overlap between claim and counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
There is reason to believe the Claimant will be unable to pay the Defendant’s costs if ordered to do so, and it is just to make an order for security for costs, especially given the Defendant’s undertaking to stay or dismiss the counterclaim if the Claimant’s claim is dismissed for failure to provide security.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs granted
Orders
- Defendant is entitled to an order for security for costs; form and amount to be determined after further submissions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment