Prinse v Landmasters (Overseas) Ltd & Ors [2022] EWHC 1921 (Ch) (21 July 2022)
The applicant, though a majority shareholder, is prevented by court orders from exercising control over the companies, resulting in wrongdoer control by the defendants. This constitutes exceptional circumstances justifying the continuation of derivative and double derivative claims under common law. The stay of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1921 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Mr Nicholas Prinse; Defendant: Landmasters (Overseas) Ltd; Defendant: Landmasters Developments Ltd; Defendant: Mr George Nicolaides; Defendant: Mr Chris Nicolaides; Defendant: Mr Christopher Takis Christoforou; Non Defendant Respondent: Landmasters Development UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Claim / Interlocutory Application for Continuation of Proprietary and Freezing Orders, Permission to Amend Claim, and Permission to Continue Derivative Actions
- Outcome
- Permission granted to continue derivative and double derivative claims; stay lifted for these purposes; permission to amend claim and add parties granted; interim proprietary and freezing orders continued against LDUK only; applications for relief against individual defendants dismissed at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Actions, Freezing Injunctions, Directors' Fiduciary Duties, Wrongdoer Control, Shareholder Remedies, Procedural Stays, Amendment of Pleadings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Nicholas Prinse
Applicant/claimant
Landmasters (Overseas) Ltd
Defendant
Landmasters Developments Ltd
Defendant
Mr George Nicolaides
Defendant
Mr Chris Nicolaides
Defendant
Mr Christopher Takis Christoforou
Defendant
Landmasters Development UK Limited
Non Defendant Respondent
Procedural Posture
Derivative Claim / Interlocutory Application for Continuation of Proprietary and Freezing Orders, Permission to Amend Claim, and Permission to Continue Derivative Actions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has standing to bring and continue derivative and double derivative claims as a majority shareholder under common law and Cyprus law
- 2 Whether interim proprietary and freezing orders should be continued against LDUK and/or the individual defendants
- 3 Whether the stay of proceedings should be lifted to allow the claim to proceed
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, though a majority shareholder, is prevented by court orders from exercising control over the companies, resulting in wrongdoer control by the defendants. This constitutes exceptional circumstances justifying the continuation of derivative and double derivative claims under common law. The stay of proceedings is lifted to allow the claims to proceed, and permission is granted to amend the claim and add parties. Interim proprietary and freezing orders are continued against LDUK only, as the evidential threshold for relief against the individual defendants is not met at this stage.
Court Disposition
Permission granted to continue derivative and double derivative claims; stay lifted for these purposes; permission to amend claim and add parties granted; interim proprietary and freezing orders continued against LDUK only; applications for relief against individual defendants dismissed at this stage.
Orders
- Stay of proceedings lifted for purposes of applications and amendments
- Permission granted to continue derivative and double derivative claims
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment