Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011)

Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011)

The agreement reached between the parties was an agreement in principle and impliedly subject to contract; therefore, no binding agreement to assign the causes of action was concluded.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 839 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Ian Moria; Claimant: Harmanjit Gill; Defendant: Lane Bednash
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Formation of Contract, Assignment of Causes of Action, Subject to Contract, Liquidator Powers
Contract Law Insolvency Law Formation of Contract Assignment of Causes of Action Subject to Contract Liquidator Powers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ian Moria

Claimant

Harmanjit Gill

Claimant

Lane Bednash

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a binding agreement to assign causes of action was concluded between the parties
  2. 2 Whether negotiations were subject to contract and thus not binding

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement reached between the parties was an agreement in principle and impliedly subject to contract; therefore, no binding agreement to assign the causes of action was concluded.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed