Larry Trachtenberg v The Commissioners for HMRC
Sections 208 and 209 FA 2004 impose charges to income tax arising in the year of assessment when an unauthorised payment is made; such charges are subject to self-assessment and may be assessed under section 29 TMA 1970 without the need for regulations under section 255 FA 2004. The statutory language and context do not support the appellant's restrictive interpretation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Larry Trachtenberg; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber) Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Pension Schemes, Unauthorised Payments, Self Assessment, Assessment Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Larry Trachtenberg
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber) Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC has power under section 29 Taxes Management Act 1970 to assess amounts chargeable to income tax under sections 208 and 209 Finance Act 2004
- 2 Whether regulations under section 255 Finance Act 2004 are required for such assessments
- 3 Whether charges under sections 208 and 209 are for a year of assessment and subject to self-assessment
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 208 and 209 FA 2004 impose charges to income tax arising in the year of assessment when an unauthorised payment is made; such charges are subject to self-assessment and may be assessed under section 29 TMA 1970 without the need for regulations under section 255 FA 2004. The statutory language and context do not support the appellant's restrictive interpretation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The assessments were validly raised and stand.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment