Heritage Travel and Tourism Ltd & Anor v Windhorst & Ors [2021] EWHC 2380 (Comm) (27 August 2021)

Heritage Travel and Tourism Ltd & Anor v Windhorst & Ors [2021] EWHC 2380 (Comm) (27 August 2021)

The Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim on grounds of economic duress, implied condition precedent, rectification, or penalty. The June Settlement is enforceable, and the Claimants are entitled to judgment for the unpaid sums per the Tomlin Order.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 2380 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: Heritage Travel and Tourism Limited; Claimant: MLDO Private Foundation; Defendant: Lars Windhorst; Defendant: Tennor Holding B.V.; Defendant: La Perla Fashion Finance B.V.; Defendant: Civitas Properties Finance B.V.
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Application to Lift Stay and Enter Summary Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered for Claimants; stay lifted.
Legal Topics
Settlement Agreements, Economic Duress, Summary Judgment, Contractual Interpretation, Penalty Clauses
Contract Law Commercial Law Settlement Agreements Economic Duress Summary Judgment Contractual Interpretation Penalty Clauses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Heritage Travel and Tourism Limited

Claimant

MLDO Private Foundation

Claimant

Lars Windhorst

Defendant

Tennor Holding B.V.

Defendant

La Perla Fashion Finance B.V.

Defendant

Civitas Properties Finance B.V.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Claim / Application to Lift Stay and Enter Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the June Settlement is enforceable against the Defendants
  2. 2 Whether economic duress or unconscionable bargain renders the June Settlement voidable
  3. 3 Whether an implied condition precedent (completion of Evergreen Transaction) exists

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim on grounds of economic duress, implied condition precedent, rectification, or penalty. The June Settlement is enforceable, and the Claimants are entitled to judgment for the unpaid sums per the Tomlin Order.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for Claimants; stay lifted.

Orders

  • Stay of proceedings lifted
  • Judgment entered against Defendants for unpaid sums under June Settlement