Lawrence, R. v
The offences were violent, planned robberies of jewellers’ shops with aggravating features, justifying a starting point of 11-12 years before mitigation. However, proper allowance for youth, lack of relevant previous convictions, intellectual limitations, and guilty pleas warranted a reduction to 7 years for each...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Laschelle Naithan Lawrence; Appellant: Jake Whittingham; Appellant: Andrew Anthony Duncan; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeals allowed in part; sentences reduced
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Sentencing, Appeal Against Sentence, Mitigation, Application of Sentencing Guidelines
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laschelle Naithan Lawrence
Appellant
Jake Whittingham
Appellant
Andrew Anthony Duncan
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the appellants were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the correct part of the Robbery Sentencing Guidelines was applied
- 3 Appropriate allowance for personal mitigation and guilty pleas
Ratio Decidendi
The offences were violent, planned robberies of jewellers’ shops with aggravating features, justifying a starting point of 11-12 years before mitigation. However, proper allowance for youth, lack of relevant previous convictions, intellectual limitations, and guilty pleas warranted a reduction to 7 years for each appellant.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed in part; sentences reduced
Orders
- Sentences for Lawrence and Whittingham reduced from 8 years to 7 years imprisonment.
- Sentence for Duncan reduced from 8.5 years to 7 years detention in a Young Offender Institution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment