Laser Byte Ltd v The Commissioners for HMRC
Mr Puttock was not a fixed rate employee under paragraph 7.6 due to the informal and variable nature of his salary arrangements, and the purported February 2020 pay increase was not effective at that time but was retrospectively reported in March 2020 to increase CJRS claims. The correct reference salary is £550, and the CJRS overpayment assessment should be reduced to £7,427.92.
- Parties
- Appellant: Laser Byte Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed subject to reduction of assessment
- Legal Topics
- Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, PAYE Reporting, Reference Salary Calculation, Fixed Vs Variable Rate Employee, HMRC Assessment and Clawback
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laser Byte Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Puttock was a fixed rate employee under paragraph 7.6 of the First Direction
- 2 Whether the purported February 2020 pay increase was effective for CJRS reference salary calculation or was retrospectively reported to increase CJRS claims
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Puttock was not a fixed rate employee under paragraph 7.6 due to the informal and variable nature of his salary arrangements, and the purported February 2020 pay increase was not effective at that time but was retrospectively reported in March 2020 to increase CJRS claims. The correct reference salary is £550, and the CJRS overpayment assessment should be reduced to £7,427.92.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed subject to reduction of assessment
Orders
- Assessment reduced from £8,357.19 to £7,427.92 under section 50(6) TMA 1970
- Appeal otherwise dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment