Lashley, R v [2005] EWCA Crim 2016 (28 July 2005)
The judge's repeated and inappropriate personal animosity towards defence counsel, including public criticism of her ability and integrity, interfered with due process and undermined the defendant's confidence in the administration of justice, rendering the convictions unsafe.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Crim 2016
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: Lashley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Fair Trial, Judicial Conduct, Identification Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Lashley
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's conduct deprived the defendant of a fair trial
- 2 Whether the identification evidence was properly admitted
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's repeated and inappropriate personal animosity towards defence counsel, including public criticism of her ability and integrity, interfered with due process and undermined the defendant's confidence in the administration of justice, rendering the convictions unsafe.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed
Orders
- appeal allowed
- no retrial ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment