Jansons v Latvia
The uncontested psychiatric evidence established a substantial and immediate risk that the claimant would commit suicide if extradited to Latvia, making extradition oppressive under section 25 of the Extradition Act 2003. The proportionality assessment under Article 8 ECHR also weighed in favour of discharge due to the exceptional facts and risk to life, despite the seriousness of the offences and the existence of safeguards in Latvia.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jansons; Defendant: Latvia
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; extradition order quashed; claimant discharged
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Suicide Risk, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Mental Health and Extradition, Oppression Under Extradition Act 2003
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jansons
Claimant
Latvia
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extradition would be oppressive under section 25 of the Extradition Act 2003 due to risk of suicide
- 2 Whether extradition would violate Article 3 or Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The uncontested psychiatric evidence established a substantial and immediate risk that the claimant would commit suicide if extradited to Latvia, making extradition oppressive under section 25 of the Extradition Act 2003. The proportionality assessment under Article 8 ECHR also weighed in favour of discharge due to the exceptional facts and risk to life, despite the seriousness of the offences and the existence of safeguards in Latvia.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; extradition order quashed; claimant discharged
Orders
- Order for extradition quashed
- Claimant discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment