Lauren Sharp v Information Commissioner

Lauren Sharp v Information Commissioner

The Tribunal has no power under section 166 DPA to consider the merits or substantive outcome of a complaint; its jurisdiction is limited to procedural failings. As the Commissioner concluded the investigation and provided outcomes, there is no reasonable prospect of the Applicant’s case succeeding.

Parties
Applicant: Lauren Sharp; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 166(2) Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Decision
Outcome
Proceedings struck out under Rule 8(3)(c) for no reasonable prospect of success.
Legal Topics
Procedural Jurisdiction Under Section 166 DPA, Scope of Tribunal Powers, Complaints Handling, GDPR Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lauren Sharp

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 166(2) Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Decision

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the merits or substantive outcome of a complaint under section 166 DPA
  2. 2 Whether the Commissioner failed to comply with procedural requirements under section 166(1) DPA

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal has no power under section 166 DPA to consider the merits or substantive outcome of a complaint; its jurisdiction is limited to procedural failings. As the Commissioner concluded the investigation and provided outcomes, there is no reasonable prospect of the Applicant’s case succeeding.

Court Disposition

Proceedings struck out under Rule 8(3)(c) for no reasonable prospect of success.

Orders

  • The proceedings are struck out.