Kingsley v Orban

Kingsley v Orban

The court found that Mr Williams was not overhasty in issuing the application given the pressing deadline and clear warnings to Mr Kingsley. The failure to serve the costs schedule in time was a mere failure without aggravating factors and did not cause substantive prejudice. The costs claimed were reasonable and proportionate, and the deputy district judge's assessment was upheld.

Parties
Appellant: Laurence Kingsley; Respondent: Judith Orban
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Costs Assessment, Practice Direction Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laurence Kingsley

Appellant

Judith Orban

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's solicitor was overhasty in issuing an application to set aside the statutory demand
  2. 2 Whether failure to comply with Practice Direction regarding costs schedule warranted reduction or refusal of costs
  3. 3 Whether the costs claimed were reasonable and proportionate

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mr Williams was not overhasty in issuing the application given the pressing deadline and clear warnings to Mr Kingsley. The failure to serve the costs schedule in time was a mere failure without aggravating factors and did not cause substantive prejudice. The costs claimed were reasonable and proportionate, and the deputy district judge's assessment was upheld.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Mr Kingsley to pay Miss Orban’s costs as assessed by the deputy district judge
  • Costs assessed at £2,208 plus VAT, total £2,649.60