North Devon District Council, R (on the application of) v First Secretary Of State & Anor [2004] EWHC 578 (Admin) (12 March 2004)
Immunity from enforcement action under section 171B(3) applies to breaches of seasonal occupancy conditions if the breach has occurred in each relevant season for ten years; the breach need not be continuous throughout the year, and the council's failure to enforce during that period results in immunity and entitlement to a lawful development certificate.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 578 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: North Devon District Council; First Defendant: First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: N C Stokes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lawful Development Certificate, Seasonal Occupancy Condition, Enforcement Immunity, Section 171 B Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Devon District Council
Claimant
First Secretary of State
First Defendant
N C Stokes
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Can immunity from enforcement action be acquired in the case of breach of a seasonal occupancy condition under section 171B(3) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990?
- 2 Does repeated seasonal breach constitute separate breaches or a single continuing breach for the purposes of enforcement immunity?
Ratio Decidendi
Immunity from enforcement action under section 171B(3) applies to breaches of seasonal occupancy conditions if the breach has occurred in each relevant season for ten years; the breach need not be continuous throughout the year, and the council's failure to enforce during that period results in immunity and entitlement to a lawful development certificate.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to pay First Defendant's costs, summarily assessed at £5,265.
- Permission to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment