Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd & Ors
The CDPA 1988, as amended, confers rights in respect of performances by performers who died before the Act came into force, and such rights vest in their personal representatives. The qualifying country status is to be assessed at the time of infringement, not performance, in line with international obligations. There was no real prospect of the defendants defending the claim on the facts, so summary judgment was appropriate.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Experience Hendrix LLC; Defendant/appellant: Purple Haze Records Ltd; Defendant: Lawrence Miller; Third Defendant: John Arthur Hillman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (intellectual Property) / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Performers' Rights, Copyright, International Treaties, Retrospective Application, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Experience Hendrix LLC
Claimant/respondent
Purple Haze Records Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Lawrence Miller
Defendant
John Arthur Hillman
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (intellectual Property) / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 confers rights on performances by performers who died before the Act came into force ('dead performer' point)
- 2 Whether performances in countries that became 'qualifying countries' after the performance are protected ('qualifying country' point)
- 3 Whether the factual disputes regarding ownership of rights are suitable for summary judgment ('summary judgment' point)
Ratio Decidendi
The CDPA 1988, as amended, confers rights in respect of performances by performers who died before the Act came into force, and such rights vest in their personal representatives. The qualifying country status is to be assessed at the time of infringement, not performance, in line with international obligations. There was no real prospect of the defendants defending the claim on the facts, so summary judgment was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Summary judgment for the claimant/respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment