OJSC TNK-BB v Lazurenko

OJSC TNK-BB v Lazurenko

Respondent is entitled to costs from and including 16 November 2012, as the court directed attendance and submissions, and the appeal was withdrawn; costs to be assessed on indemnity basis as previously ordered by the Chancellor.

Parties
Claimant: OJSC TNK-BP; Defendant: Lazurenko
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Costs Following Withdrawal of Appeal
Outcome
Costs awarded to respondent on indemnity basis from and including 16 November 2012, excluding costs for potential security for costs application.
Legal Topics
Costs, Appeals, Injunctions, Stay of Execution
Civil Procedure Costs Appeals Injunctions Stay of Execution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

OJSC TNK-BP

Claimant

Lazurenko

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Costs Following Withdrawal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether respondent is entitled to costs after appeal withdrawal and court directions to attend hearing
  2. 2 Basis for assessment of costs

Ratio Decidendi

Respondent is entitled to costs from and including 16 November 2012, as the court directed attendance and submissions, and the appeal was withdrawn; costs to be assessed on indemnity basis as previously ordered by the Chancellor.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to respondent on indemnity basis from and including 16 November 2012, excluding costs for potential security for costs application.

Orders

  • Respondent awarded costs from and including 16 November 2012 on indemnity basis.
  • Costs for potential security for costs application excluded.