KC, Re

KC, Re

Due to entrenched conflict among KC's daughters and evidence that they would not be able to act together in KC's best interests, registration of the LPAs would not be in KC's best interests. The court therefore refused registration and ordered appointment of an independent panel deputy for KC's property and affairs.

Parties
Applicant: LCR; First Respondent: SC; Second Respondent: AEC; Third Respondent: CP; Fourth Respondent: KC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application to register LPAs refused.
Legal Topics
Lasting Power of Attorney, Best Interests, Appointment of Deputies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LCR

Applicant

SC

First Respondent

AEC

Second Respondent

CP

Third Respondent

KC

Fourth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Court of Protection Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether LPAs executed by KC should be registered
  2. 2 Whether registration is in KC's best interests given family conflict

Ratio Decidendi

Due to entrenched conflict among KC's daughters and evidence that they would not be able to act together in KC's best interests, registration of the LPAs would not be in KC's best interests. The court therefore refused registration and ordered appointment of an independent panel deputy for KC's property and affairs.

Court Disposition

Application to register LPAs refused.

Orders

  • Neither LPA instrument to be registered.
  • Panel deputy to be appointed to manage KC's property and affairs.