Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v Ayres & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 52 (07 February 2008)
The Supplemental Deed does not limit the respondents' liability under their guarantee; it only restricts recourse against the personal assets of Altheimer & Gray's partners. The respondents remain liable for the outstanding rent and charges under the Licence. The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 does not assist the respondents, and the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 does not render the guarantee void.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 52
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd; Defendant/respondent: David Monroe Ayres; Defendant/respondent: Christopher Grew
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Lease Assignment, Guarantees, Landlord and Tenant, Contract Interpretation, Third Party Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd
Claimant/appellant
David Monroe Ayres
Defendant/respondent
Christopher Grew
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supplemental Deed limits the appellant's right to recover rent from the respondents under their guarantee.
- 2 Whether the respondents can rely on the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce the Supplemental Deed.
- 3 Whether clauses 6.3 and 6.4 of the Licence are void under sections 16 and 25 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supplemental Deed does not limit the respondents' liability under their guarantee; it only restricts recourse against the personal assets of Altheimer & Gray's partners. The respondents remain liable for the outstanding rent and charges under the Licence. The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 does not assist the respondents, and the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 does not render the guarantee void.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Respondents are liable for the outstanding rent and charges under the Licence.
- No relief from liability under the Supplemental Deed or the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment