- v - (Eastern : Section 60) [2014] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UJ_OLR_2013_0159 (21 March 2014)

The leaseholder is not liable for any costs arising from a notice for lease extension due to the landlord's unreasonable behaviour, specifically not filing as required.

Citation: [2014] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UJ_OLR_2013_0159
Parties: Leaseholder: Graham Paul Wandsworth; Landlord: Emil Investments Ltd
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 21 March 2014
Procedural Posture: Lease Extension Dispute / Decision
Outcome: leaseholder not liable for costs
Legal Topics: Lease Extension, Costs Liability, Unreasonable Behaviour

Property Law Landlord and Tenant Lease Extension Costs Liability Unreasonable Behaviour

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Graham Paul Wandsworth

Leaseholder

Emil Investments Ltd

Landlord

Procedural Posture

Lease Extension Dispute / Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the leaseholder is liable for costs arising from a notice for lease extension when the landlord has acted unreasonably

Ratio Decidendi

The leaseholder is not liable for any costs arising from a notice for lease extension due to the landlord's unreasonable behaviour, specifically not filing as required.

Court Disposition

leaseholder not liable for costs

Orders

Leaseholder is not liable for any costs arising from the notice for lease extension.