Brownfern Properties Ltd v Al-Amood [2001] EWCA Civ 605 (24 April 2001)

Brownfern Properties Ltd v Al-Amood [2001] EWCA Civ 605 (24 April 2001)

The applicant was properly debarred from defending due to non-compliance with unless orders, and the trial judge was entitled to proceed on the evidence presented by the claimant. The lease imposed clear obligations for repairs and arrears, and there was no real prospect of success on appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 605
Parties
Claimant: Brownfern Properties Limited; Defendant/applicant: Walthib Al-Amood
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal, Extension of Time, and Stay of Execution
Outcome
applications dismissed
Legal Topics
Lease Obligations, Arrears of Rent, Dilapidations, Debarment Orders, Procedural Default
Landlord and Tenant Contract Lease Obligations Arrears of Rent Dilapidations Debarment Orders Procedural Default

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brownfern Properties Limited

Claimant

Walthib Al-Amood

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal, Extension of Time, and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is liable under the lease for repairs and arrears of rent
  2. 2 Whether the debarring order was unjust or inequitable
  3. 3 Whether the appeal can circumvent the debarring order

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was properly debarred from defending due to non-compliance with unless orders, and the trial judge was entitled to proceed on the evidence presented by the claimant. The lease imposed clear obligations for repairs and arrears, and there was no real prospect of success on appeal.

Court Disposition

applications dismissed

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal dismissed
  • Application for extension of time dismissed