Pardoe, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 740 (14 June 2024)
The applicant's delay in seeking leave to appeal was unjustified and unsupported by credible evidence; his guilty plea was voluntary, informed, and unequivocal, with no credible basis for suggesting the proceedings were unlawful or an abuse of process; there were no arguable grounds that the conviction was unsafe.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 740
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Lee Pardoe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- renewed application for extension of time refused
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Against Conviction, Guilty Plea, Indecent Images, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Lee Pardoe
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal against conviction
- 2 Whether there are arguable grounds that the conviction is unsafe following a guilty plea
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's delay in seeking leave to appeal was unjustified and unsupported by credible evidence; his guilty plea was voluntary, informed, and unequivocal, with no credible basis for suggesting the proceedings were unlawful or an abuse of process; there were no arguable grounds that the conviction was unsafe.
Court Disposition
renewed application for extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment