Walker, R. v [2019] EWCA Crim 867 (09 May 2019)
The judge was entitled to categorise the robbery as 2C and the burglary in the upper half of category 1. The theft of the vehicle constituted separate criminality and justified a consecutive sentence. The total sentence of five-and-a-half years was not manifestly excessive given the appellant's record and the seriousness of the offences.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Crim 867
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Lee Robert Walker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Burglary, Theft, Sentencing, Consecutive Sentences, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Lee Robert Walker
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for theft of the vehicle should have been concurrent with the sentence for robbery
- 2 Whether the overall sentence was manifestly excessive
- 3 Proper categorisation of the robbery and burglary under Sentencing Council guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to categorise the robbery as 2C and the burglary in the upper half of category 1. The theft of the vehicle constituted separate criminality and justified a consecutive sentence. The total sentence of five-and-a-half years was not manifestly excessive given the appellant's record and the seriousness of the offences.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment