Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1)
The construction of agricultural buildings in the Green Belt is, by definition under national and local policy, appropriate development and not harmful to openness or Green Belt purposes; the council lawfully applied the statutory and policy presumptions, properly balanced planning considerations, and was entitled to rely on Natural England's advice in concluding that no appropriate assessment was required under the Habitats Directive. There was no misinterpretation or misapplication of policy, nor any procedural or substantive error in the council's decision-making process.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lee Valley Regional Park Authority; Respondent: Epping Forest District Council; Interested Party: Valley Grown Nurseries Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Green Belt Policy, Development Control, Habitats Directive, Judicial Review, Local Plan Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Valley Regional Park Authority
Appellant
Epping Forest District Council
Respondent
Valley Grown Nurseries Ltd.
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation and application of national and local Green Belt policy for agricultural buildings
- 2 Application of the statutory and policy presumptions in planning decisions
- 3 Compliance with the Habitats Directive and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The construction of agricultural buildings in the Green Belt is, by definition under national and local policy, appropriate development and not harmful to openness or Green Belt purposes; the council lawfully applied the statutory and policy presumptions, properly balanced planning considerations, and was entitled to rely on Natural England's advice in concluding that no appropriate assessment was required under the Habitats Directive. There was no misinterpretation or misapplication of policy, nor any procedural or substantive error in the council's decision-making process.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment