Shawn Perrie v Leeds Trinity University
Permission for judicial review is refused because the claim is academic, factual disputes are more appropriately resolved in the County Court, and an adequate alternative remedy exists. The irrationality ground is not arguable given the information provided to the University.
- Parties
- Claimant: Shawn Perrie; Defendant: Leeds Trinity University; Interested Party: Leeds Trinity Students Union
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission
- Outcome
- Permission for judicial review refused
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Alternative Remedies, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly, University Governance, Charity Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shawn Perrie
Claimant
Leeds Trinity University
Defendant
Leeds Trinity Students Union
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the University unlawfully prevented the Claimant from attending the AGM
- 2 Whether the University breached Articles 10 and 11 ECHR
- 3 Whether the University failed to secure fair and democratic operation of the Union under Education Act 1994 s.22
Ratio Decidendi
Permission for judicial review is refused because the claim is academic, factual disputes are more appropriately resolved in the County Court, and an adequate alternative remedy exists. The irrationality ground is not arguable given the information provided to the University.
Court Disposition
Permission for judicial review refused
Orders
- Permission refused on all grounds
- Issues to be ventilated in County Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment