Chaney, R (on the application of) v Legal Services Commission
A declaration of incompatibility with Article 6 ECHR regarding the remuneration provisions for counsel is not appropriate in the absence of a concluded process in the applicant's individual case; breaches of Article 6 are personal and must be determined in the context of the specific proceedings.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sean Chaney; Defendant: Legal Services Commission
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission for Declaration of Incompatibility
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Aid, Confiscation Proceedings, Article 6 ECHR, Access to Justice, Remuneration of Counsel
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sean Chaney
Claimant
Legal Services Commission
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission for Declaration of Incompatibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the low rates of remuneration for counsel under the Criminal Defence Service Funding Order 2001 are incompatible with Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether a declaration of incompatibility should be granted in advance of the conclusion of the confiscation proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
A declaration of incompatibility with Article 6 ECHR regarding the remuneration provisions for counsel is not appropriate in the absence of a concluded process in the applicant's individual case; breaches of Article 6 are personal and must be determined in the context of the specific proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Permission to apply for a declaration of incompatibility refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment