Cavaliere v Legal Services Commission
The Claimant holds the sum of £46,222.27, representing the costs paid by the Legal Services Commission, on constructive trust for the Commission out of the monies recovered from Equitas, as it would be inequitable for her to retain the full benefit without repaying the public funds advanced for the original litigation.
- Parties
- Claimant: Eileen Cavaliere; Defendant: Legal Services Commission
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Charge, Constructive Trusts, Legal Aid Recovery, Third Parties (rights Against Insurers) Act 1930
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eileen Cavaliere
Claimant
Legal Services Commission
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Legal Services Commission is entitled to a statutory charge or constructive trust over monies recovered from insurers under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 after judgment against an insolvent defendant obtained with legal aid.
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant holds the sum of £46,222.27, representing the costs paid by the Legal Services Commission, on constructive trust for the Commission out of the monies recovered from Equitas, as it would be inequitable for her to retain the full benefit without repaying the public funds advanced for the original litigation.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The Claimant is not entitled to a declaration that she is entitled to the entirety of the monies recovered from Equitas.
- The Claimant holds £46,222.27 on trust for the Legal Services Commission, who are entitled to payment of that sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment