Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v Lehman Brothers Finance SA
The Side Letter is a material term of the Inter-company Transactions and must be taken into account in determining the Close-out Amount under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement. The 2002 Agreement's express inclusion of 'material terms' and 'option rights' in the definition of Close-out Amount, together with the User’s Guide and commercial context, overrides the value clean principle as applied in the 1992 Agreement. The assumption of satisfaction of conditions precedent does not exclude the Side Letter from the valuation process.
- Parties
- Appellants: The Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe); Respondent: Lehman Brothers Finance SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Companies Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of ISDA Master Agreement, Close Out Amount Calculation, Value Clean Principle, Material Terms in Derivatives Contracts, Automatic Early Termination, Option Rights in Financial Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe)
Appellants
Lehman Brothers Finance SA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Companies Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Side Letter between LBIE and LBF should be treated as a material term for the purposes of calculating the Close-out Amount under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement upon early termination of intercompany derivative transactions.
- 2 Whether the 'value clean' principle or continuity assumption overrides the inclusion of the Side Letter as a material term in the valuation process.
Ratio Decidendi
The Side Letter is a material term of the Inter-company Transactions and must be taken into account in determining the Close-out Amount under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement. The 2002 Agreement's express inclusion of 'material terms' and 'option rights' in the definition of Close-out Amount, together with the User’s Guide and commercial context, overrides the value clean principle as applied in the 1992 Agreement. The assumption of satisfaction of conditions precedent does not exclude the Side Letter from the valuation process.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; the Side Letter must be taken into account as a material term in determining the Close-out Amount under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment