Arag Plc v Jones & Anor
Ms Gibson, as joint debtor, had a common law right to contribution from the defendant for costs paid to Mr Francis, and ARAG Plc as her indemnity insurer is entitled to be subrogated to that right; the claim is not statute-barred and judgment is entered for £20,000.
- Parties
- Claimant: ARAG Plc; Defendant: Leighton Jones; Third Party: Newbold & Co.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim for Contribution / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant for £20,000 as contribution from the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Contribution Between Joint Debtors, Subrogation Rights of Insurers, Limitation Periods, Indemnity Insurance, Costs Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ARAG Plc
Claimant
Leighton Jones
Defendant
Newbold & Co.
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim for Contribution / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ms Gibson had a cause of action for contribution against the defendant
- 2 Whether the claim for contribution is barred by limitation
- 3 Whether the claimant insurer is entitled to bring the claim by subrogation
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Gibson, as joint debtor, had a common law right to contribution from the defendant for costs paid to Mr Francis, and ARAG Plc as her indemnity insurer is entitled to be subrogated to that right; the claim is not statute-barred and judgment is entered for £20,000.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant for £20,000 as contribution from the defendant.
Orders
- Defendant to pay claimant £20,000 as contribution for costs paid to Mr Francis.
- No contribution ordered for costs lawyers' fees (£1,200).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment