Smith, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 25 (22 January 2025)

Smith, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 25 (22 January 2025)

The fresh evidence of Mr Khalifa Benjamin, even if believed, fundamentally contradicts the appellant's explanation for his presence at Barrington Court and does not support the appellant's defence. The evidence, if given at trial, could not reasonably have affected the jury's decision to convict. The conviction is therefore safe.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 25
Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Leon Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (post Trial, Post Sentence)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Conviction, Fresh Evidence, Conspiracy, Possession of Firearm, Unsafe Conviction, Section 23 Criminal Appeal Act 1968
Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Fresh Evidence Conspiracy Possession of Firearm Unsafe Conviction Section 23 Criminal Appeal Act 1968

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Leon Smith

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (post Trial, Post Sentence)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether fresh evidence from Mr Khalifa Benjamin renders the appellant's convictions on Counts 13 and 14 unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's explanation for presence at Barrington Court is credible in light of new evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The fresh evidence of Mr Khalifa Benjamin, even if believed, fundamentally contradicts the appellant's explanation for his presence at Barrington Court and does not support the appellant's defence. The evidence, if given at trial, could not reasonably have affected the jury's decision to convict. The conviction is therefore safe.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed