Silkstone & Anor v Tatnall

Silkstone & Anor v Tatnall

The Adjudicator retains jurisdiction to determine the matter referred to him even after a party purports to withdraw their objection; withdrawal of the underlying objection is ineffective once the matter is before the Adjudicator. The Adjudicator's function is to determine the substantive rights unless there is full agreement between the parties.

Parties
Appellant: Leonard Stuart Silkstone; Appellant: Gary Greville Silkstone; First Respondent: Simon Derek Tatnall; Second Respondent: Chief Land Registrar
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Objection, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Land Registration, Unilateral Notice, Right of Way

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Stuart Silkstone

Appellant

Gary Greville Silkstone

Appellant

Simon Derek Tatnall

First Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Adjudicator can refuse permission to withdraw from proceedings before him
  2. 2 Whether the Adjudicator retains jurisdiction to determine the merits after a party purports to withdraw their objection

Ratio Decidendi

The Adjudicator retains jurisdiction to determine the matter referred to him even after a party purports to withdraw their objection; withdrawal of the underlying objection is ineffective once the matter is before the Adjudicator. The Adjudicator's function is to determine the substantive rights unless there is full agreement between the parties.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Deputy Adjudicator's decision affirmed