Silkstone & Anor v Tatnall
The Adjudicator retains jurisdiction to determine the matter referred to him even after a party purports to withdraw their objection; withdrawal of the underlying objection is ineffective once the matter is before the Adjudicator. The Adjudicator's function is to determine the substantive rights unless there is full agreement between the parties.
- Parties
- Appellant: Leonard Stuart Silkstone; Appellant: Gary Greville Silkstone; First Respondent: Simon Derek Tatnall; Second Respondent: Chief Land Registrar
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Withdrawal of Objection, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Land Registration, Unilateral Notice, Right of Way
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leonard Stuart Silkstone
Appellant
Gary Greville Silkstone
Appellant
Simon Derek Tatnall
First Respondent
Chief Land Registrar
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Adjudicator can refuse permission to withdraw from proceedings before him
- 2 Whether the Adjudicator retains jurisdiction to determine the merits after a party purports to withdraw their objection
Ratio Decidendi
The Adjudicator retains jurisdiction to determine the matter referred to him even after a party purports to withdraw their objection; withdrawal of the underlying objection is ineffective once the matter is before the Adjudicator. The Adjudicator's function is to determine the substantive rights unless there is full agreement between the parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Deputy Adjudicator's decision affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment