Goss-Custard & Anor v Templeman & Ors [2018] EWHC 2476 (Ch) (24 September 2018)
There are triable issues as to the deceased's testamentary capacity in 2008, supported by credible evidence from both sides, and the claimants have a real prospect of success; summary judgment is inappropriate and the matter must proceed to trial.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 2476 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Jane Goss-Custard; Claimant: Sarah Edworthy; Defendant: Lesley Templeman; Defendant: Michael Richard Templeman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Claim / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment dismissed; claim to proceed to trial.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Summary Judgment, Validity of Wills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Goss-Custard
Claimant
Sarah Edworthy
Claimant
Lesley Templeman
Defendant
Michael Richard Templeman
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Claim / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased, Sydney William Baron Templeman, had testamentary capacity when executing the 2008 Will
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted pronouncing against the 2008 Will
Ratio Decidendi
There are triable issues as to the deceased's testamentary capacity in 2008, supported by credible evidence from both sides, and the claimants have a real prospect of success; summary judgment is inappropriate and the matter must proceed to trial.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment dismissed; claim to proceed to trial.
Orders
- The claim will proceed to be listed for trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment