Leslie B, R. v

Leslie B, R. v

The delay and missing records did not render the trial unfair; the appellant was able to challenge the evidence and call witnesses. The trial judge's directions on delay were adequate and tailored to the case. The admission of AB's evidence was proper and did not prejudice the fairness of the proceedings.

Parties
Appellant: Leslie B; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Delay in Prosecution, Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence, Fair Trial Rights
Criminal Law Abuse of Process Delay in Prosecution Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence Fair Trial Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leslie B

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings should be stayed as an abuse of process due to delay and missing records
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge's directions on delay were adequate
  3. 3 Whether the admission of bad character evidence from AB was unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The delay and missing records did not render the trial unfair; the appellant was able to challenge the evidence and call witnesses. The trial judge's directions on delay were adequate and tailored to the case. The admission of AB's evidence was proper and did not prejudice the fairness of the proceedings.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed