Pitts v Hartman & Ors [2001] EWCA Civ 962 (19 June 2001)

Pitts v Hartman & Ors [2001] EWCA Civ 962 (19 June 2001)

The application to set aside the order was dismissed because the applicant acknowledged there was little point in pursuing the matter further, and no other issues were before the court.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 962
Parties
Applicant: Leslie David Pitts; Respondents: Hartman & Others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Directions Order
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Orders, Appeal Procedure
Civil Procedure Setting Aside Orders Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leslie David Pitts

Applicant

Hartman & Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Directions Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the order of Master Venne dated 27th September 2000 should be set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The application to set aside the order was dismissed because the applicant acknowledged there was little point in pursuing the matter further, and no other issues were before the court.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application to set aside decision of Master Venne dismissed