Glatt & Ors v Sinclair
A court-appointed receiver under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 is entitled to recover remuneration, expenses, and disbursements for work done post-discharge, provided such work relates to the conclusion of the receivership and is approved by the court. The right to indemnity and lien over receivership assets continues after discharge. The appellants are precluded from raising the jurisdictional argument at this stage due to their conduct and the detriment to the receiver.
- Parties
- Appellants: Leslie Glatt and Rita Glatt; Appellant: Leslie Glatt; Appellant: The Alba Charitable Trust; Appellant: The Louis Glatt Charitable Settlement; Respondent: Nigel Heath Sinclair
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Remuneration of Receivers, Post Discharge Costs, Court Appointed Receivers, Lien Over Assets, Jurisdiction of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leslie Glatt and Rita Glatt
Appellants
Leslie Glatt
Appellant
The Alba Charitable Trust
Appellant
The Louis Glatt Charitable Settlement
Appellant
Nigel Heath Sinclair
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a court-appointed receiver can recover remuneration, expenses, and disbursements for work done after discharge of the receivership order
- 2 Whether the interveners can raise the argument of lack of jurisdiction at the appellate stage
- 3 Whether the court had jurisdiction to order payment of post-discharge remuneration, expenses, and disbursements
Ratio Decidendi
A court-appointed receiver under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 is entitled to recover remuneration, expenses, and disbursements for work done post-discharge, provided such work relates to the conclusion of the receivership and is approved by the court. The right to indemnity and lien over receivership assets continues after discharge. The appellants are precluded from raising the jurisdictional argument at this stage due to their conduct and the detriment to the receiver.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed on all grounds.
- The receiver is entitled to recover remuneration, expenses, and disbursements for work done post-discharge, subject to court approval.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment