Maynard, R. v (Rev 1)
Appellant's dangerousness, grave nature of offence, and substantial but not total impairment of responsibility justify life imprisonment with a minimum period reflecting diminished responsibility and aggravating features.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Leslie John Maynard
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentencing After Conviction for Manslaughter on Appeal
- Outcome
- Life imprisonment imposed for manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility; minimum period set at ten years from 6 March 2008, less 759 days on remand.
- Legal Topics
- Diminished Responsibility, Manslaughter, Dangerousness, Sentencing, Mental Health Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Leslie John Maynard
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing After Conviction for Manslaughter on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a hospital order with restriction or a custodial sentence is appropriate
- 2 Whether the appellant satisfies statutory criteria for dangerousness
- 3 What form and minimum period of indeterminate sentence is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant's dangerousness, grave nature of offence, and substantial but not total impairment of responsibility justify life imprisonment with a minimum period reflecting diminished responsibility and aggravating features.
Court Disposition
Life imprisonment imposed for manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility; minimum period set at ten years from 6 March 2008, less 759 days on remand.
Orders
- Copy of transcript to be sent to prison governor and accompany appellant on any transfer.
- Minimum period recalculated to ten years less 759 days on remand.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment