Siegel v Pummell [2014] EWHC 4309 (QB) (18 December 2014)

Siegel v Pummell [2014] EWHC 4309 (QB) (18 December 2014)

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant did suffer a subtle but permanent brain injury as a result of the accident, leading to cognitive and behavioural deficits that have materially impaired his ability to work at his pre-accident level. The court accepted the claimant's and supporting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 4309
Parties
Claimant: Peter Asher Siegel; Defendant: Lester Pummell
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 December 2014
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Road Traffic Accident / Assessment of Damages
Outcome
Damages awarded to the claimant
Legal Topics
Assessment of Damages, Causation, Quantum, Brain Injury, Loss of Earnings
Tort Law Personal Injury Assessment of Damages Causation Quantum Brain Injury Loss of Earnings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Asher Siegel

Claimant

Lester Pummell

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Road Traffic Accident / Assessment of Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant suffered a permanent brain injury as a result of the accident
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's ongoing symptoms and losses are causally related to the accident
  3. 3 Assessment of quantum for general and special damages

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant did suffer a subtle but permanent brain injury as a result of the accident, leading to cognitive and behavioural deficits that have materially impaired his ability to work at his pre-accident level. The court accepted the claimant's and supporting witnesses' evidence as to the change in his functioning post-accident, and rejected the defendant's contention that the symptoms were wholly psychological or unrelated to the accident. The court assessed damages accordingly, awarding sums for general damages, past and future loss of earnings, and other heads of loss, but at a level below the claimant's full claim.

Court Disposition

Damages awarded to the claimant

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the claimant damages as assessed by the court.
  • The defendant shall pay the claimant's costs of the action.