Siegel v Pummell [2015] EWHC 195 (QB) (04 February 2015)

Siegel v Pummell [2015] EWHC 195 (QB) (04 February 2015)

Only the conduct of Professor Trimble in producing a final written statement mid-evidence, necessitating recall of Dr Allder, was sufficiently out of the norm to justify indemnity costs; other complaints did not meet the threshold.

Citation
[2015] EWHC 195 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Peter Asher Siegel; Defendant: Lester Pummell
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Outcome
Claimant awarded indemnity costs limited to recall of Dr Allder; costs reserved by Master Leslie awarded to Claimant on standard basis.
Legal Topics
Costs, Indemnity Costs, Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Asher Siegel

Claimant

Lester Pummell

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Judgment Costs Determination

  1. 1 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded from 9th September 2014
  2. 2 Whether costs reserved by Master Leslie on 17th October 2014 should be awarded

Ratio Decidendi

Only the conduct of Professor Trimble in producing a final written statement mid-evidence, necessitating recall of Dr Allder, was sufficiently out of the norm to justify indemnity costs; other complaints did not meet the threshold.

Court Disposition

Claimant awarded indemnity costs limited to recall of Dr Allder; costs reserved by Master Leslie awarded to Claimant on standard basis.

Orders

  • Indemnity costs awarded to Claimant for recall of Dr Allder occasioned by Professor Trimble's final written statement.
  • Costs reserved by Master Leslie on 17th October 2014 awarded to Claimant, to be assessed on standard basis if not agreed.