Siegel v Pummell [2015] EWHC 195 (QB) (04 February 2015)
Only the conduct of Professor Trimble in producing a final written statement mid-evidence, necessitating recall of Dr Allder, was sufficiently out of the norm to justify indemnity costs; other complaints did not meet the threshold.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 195 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Peter Asher Siegel; Defendant: Lester Pummell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded indemnity costs limited to recall of Dr Allder; costs reserved by Master Leslie awarded to Claimant on standard basis.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Asher Siegel
Claimant
Lester Pummell
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded from 9th September 2014
- 2 Whether costs reserved by Master Leslie on 17th October 2014 should be awarded
Ratio Decidendi
Only the conduct of Professor Trimble in producing a final written statement mid-evidence, necessitating recall of Dr Allder, was sufficiently out of the norm to justify indemnity costs; other complaints did not meet the threshold.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded indemnity costs limited to recall of Dr Allder; costs reserved by Master Leslie awarded to Claimant on standard basis.
Orders
- Indemnity costs awarded to Claimant for recall of Dr Allder occasioned by Professor Trimble's final written statement.
- Costs reserved by Master Leslie on 17th October 2014 awarded to Claimant, to be assessed on standard basis if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment