Gaydamak v Leviev
The 2001 Agreement was signed and enforceable, but the Settlement Agreement dated 6 August 2011 was valid, binding, and released all claims between the parties, thereby barring Gaydamak's claim.
- Parties
- Claimant: Arkady Gaydamak; Defendant: Lev Leviev
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Settlement Agreements, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Authority of Agents, Partnership Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Arkady Gaydamak
Claimant
Lev Leviev
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the 2001 Agreement signed and enforceable?
- 2 Did the Settlement Agreement come into force and bar claims?
- 3 Were payments made pursuant to the 2001 Agreement?
Ratio Decidendi
The 2001 Agreement was signed and enforceable, but the Settlement Agreement dated 6 August 2011 was valid, binding, and released all claims between the parties, thereby barring Gaydamak's claim.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed
- Parties to bear their own legal costs as per Settlement Agreement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment