R v Lewis Stacey

R v Lewis Stacey

The judge's categorisation of the offence as planned and involving grooming was reasonable based on the appellant's conduct, and the reduction of sentence to reflect mental health issues was appropriate; there was no error in approach or conclusion, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Lewis Stacey
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Appeals, Mental Health in Sentencing
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Sentencing Appeals Mental Health in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Lewis Stacey

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate categorisation of culpability for rape offences involving a child
  3. 3 Consideration of appellant's mental health and developmental disorders in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's categorisation of the offence as planned and involving grooming was reasonable based on the appellant's conduct, and the reduction of sentence to reflect mental health issues was appropriate; there was no error in approach or conclusion, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • sentence of eight years and six months special custodial sentence for offender of particular concern upheld
  • all sentences to be served concurrently