Scott v LGBT Foundation Ltd
The Data Protection Act 1998 does not apply to purely verbal disclosures; the duty of confidence was qualified by the claimant's knowledge and the confidentiality policy permitting disclosure to protect his welfare; and the defendant is not a public authority for HRA 1998 purposes. All claims are dismissed as they disclose no reasonable grounds for trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: David Paul Scott; Defendant: LGBT Foundation Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment/strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Data Protection Act 1998, Breach of Confidence, Article 8 ECHR, Summary Judgment, Public Authority Definition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Paul Scott
Claimant
LGBT Foundation Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment/strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral disclosure of sensitive personal information to a GP by a charity constitutes a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998, breach of confidence, or violation of Article 8 ECHR
- 2 Whether the Data Protection Act 1998 applies to purely verbal disclosures
- 3 Whether the duty of confidence was qualified by the charity's confidentiality policy
Ratio Decidendi
The Data Protection Act 1998 does not apply to purely verbal disclosures; the duty of confidence was qualified by the claimant's knowledge and the confidentiality policy permitting disclosure to protect his welfare; and the defendant is not a public authority for HRA 1998 purposes. All claims are dismissed as they disclose no reasonable grounds for trial.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Summary judgment granted for the defendant
- All causes of action struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment