Bate, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 137 (02 February 2024)
The inclusion of the child in the restraining order was justified for protection, but the 10-year duration was excessive and should be reduced to 5 years. The order's wording was amended to allow contact through a named third party or solicitors to ensure effective communication while maintaining protection.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 137
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Liam Daniel Bate
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Restraining Order Provisions Post Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Restraining Orders, Domestic Abuse, Child Protection, Sentence Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Liam Daniel Bate
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Restraining Order Provisions Post Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether inclusion of the child in the restraining order was justified
- 2 Whether the 10-year duration of the restraining order was excessive
- 3 Whether the wording of the restraining order permitted effective contact with the child
Ratio Decidendi
The inclusion of the child in the restraining order was justified for protection, but the 10-year duration was excessive and should be reduced to 5 years. The order's wording was amended to allow contact through a named third party or solicitors to ensure effective communication while maintaining protection.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Restraining order duration reduced from 10 years to 5 years
- Wording of restraining order amended to allow contact through Mrs Samantha Greenwell or solicitors
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment