Abdille, R v

Abdille, R v

The original sentence of 30 months was manifestly excessive in light of the guidelines and the circumstances. The proper sentence for inflicting grievous bodily harm after a guilty plea is 18 months' imprisonment. The activation of the suspended sentence in full was justified due to the appellant's failure to benefit from supervision and commission of further offences during the operational period.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Liban Abdille
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Grievous Bodily Harm, Suspended Sentence Activation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Liban Abdille

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 30 months for inflicting grievous bodily harm was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the suspended sentence should have been activated in full

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentence of 30 months was manifestly excessive in light of the guidelines and the circumstances. The proper sentence for inflicting grievous bodily harm after a guilty plea is 18 months' imprisonment. The activation of the suspended sentence in full was justified due to the appellant's failure to benefit from supervision and commission of further offences during the operational period.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • The 30-month sentence is quashed and substituted with 18 months' imprisonment for inflicting grievous bodily harm.
  • The six-month suspended sentence is activated consecutively, making a total of two years' imprisonment.