IM Properties Development Ltd v Lichfield District Council & Ors
The planning inspector properly considered legal compliance, allowed relevant evidence, the sustainability appraisal met statutory requirements, exceptional circumstances justified green belt release, and the main modifications were within statutory powers; no grounds for quashing the plan were established.
- Parties
- Claimant: IM Properties Development Limited; Defendant: Lichfield District Council; 1st Interested Party: Taylor Wimpey UK Limited; 2nd Interested Party: Persimmon Homes Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Local Plan Adoption, Sustainability Appraisal, Green Belt Policy, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Consultation Procedures, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IM Properties Development Limited
Claimant
Lichfield District Council
Defendant
Taylor Wimpey UK Limited
1st Interested Party
Persimmon Homes Limited
2nd Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the planning inspector failed to determine legal compliance of the sustainability appraisal under section 20(5) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
- 2 Whether the sustainability appraisal and process of consideration of alternatives were legally flawed and unfair
- 3 Whether the planning inspector adopted the correct approach to altering green belt boundaries
Ratio Decidendi
The planning inspector properly considered legal compliance, allowed relevant evidence, the sustainability appraisal met statutory requirements, exceptional circumstances justified green belt release, and the main modifications were within statutory powers; no grounds for quashing the plan were established.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment