Philip Warren & Son Ltd v Lidl Great Britain Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 1097 (Ch) (30 April 2021)
The evidence did not establish that Lidl's use of 'WARREN & SONS' caused a significant operative misrepresentation to any category of PWS's customers. PWS's goodwill was largely local and high-end, with minimal overlap with Lidl's customer base. There was insufficient proof of confusion or damage to support a passing off claim.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1097 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Philip Warren & Son Limited; Defendant: Lidl Great Britain Ltd; Defendant: Lidl UK GmbH; Defendant: Lidl Stiftung & Co KG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Passing Off Claim / Liability Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Goodwill, Misrepresentation, Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Warren & Son Limited
Claimant
Lidl Great Britain Ltd
Defendant
Lidl UK GmbH
Defendant
Lidl Stiftung & Co KG
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Passing Off Claim / Liability Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Did Lidl's use of 'WARREN & SONS' constitute passing off against PWS?
- 2 Did PWS have sufficient goodwill in its brand to support a passing off claim?
- 3 Was there operative misrepresentation causing confusion among relevant customers?
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not establish that Lidl's use of 'WARREN & SONS' caused a significant operative misrepresentation to any category of PWS's customers. PWS's goodwill was largely local and high-end, with minimal overlap with Lidl's customer base. There was insufficient proof of confusion or damage to support a passing off claim.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment