Areguy, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 669 (14 June 2023)

Areguy, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 669 (14 June 2023)

The Court held that the fresh expert evidence did not undermine the compelling circumstantial case against the appellant, and that the representation at trial was competent. The conviction was not unsafe and there was no unfairness in the trial process.

Citation
[2023] EWCA Crim 669
Parties
Appellant: Lielay Areguy; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Legal Topics
Conspiracy to Murder, Fresh Evidence, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Admissibility of Expert Evidence, Identification Evidence
Criminal Law Conspiracy to Murder Fresh Evidence Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Admissibility of Expert Evidence Identification Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lielay Areguy

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether fresh expert evidence on CCTV identification should be admitted and would render the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the appellant received ineffective legal representation amounting to an unfair trial

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the fresh expert evidence did not undermine the compelling circumstantial case against the appellant, and that the representation at trial was competent. The conviction was not unsafe and there was no unfairness in the trial process.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused