Sallis, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 600 (30 April 2026)
The gravity of the offence, the need for deterrence in prison drug conspiracies, and the appellant's intended role justified the sentence; personal mitigation did not outweigh these factors.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] EWCA Crim 600
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Lilea Sallis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Prison Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Conspiracy Prison Offences Sentencing Mitigation Appeal Against Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Lilea Sallis
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 30 months' imprisonment for conspiracy to convey a List A article into prison was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to personal mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The gravity of the offence, the need for deterrence in prison drug conspiracies, and the appellant's intended role justified the sentence; personal mitigation did not outweigh these factors.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment