Sallis, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 600 (30 April 2026)

Sallis, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 600 (30 April 2026)

The gravity of the offence, the need for deterrence in prison drug conspiracies, and the appellant's intended role justified the sentence; personal mitigation did not outweigh these factors.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] EWCA Crim 600
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Lilea Sallis
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy, Prison Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Conspiracy Prison Offences Sentencing Mitigation Appeal Against Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Lilea Sallis

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 30 months' imprisonment for conspiracy to convey a List A article into prison was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to personal mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

The gravity of the offence, the need for deterrence in prison drug conspiracies, and the appellant's intended role justified the sentence; personal mitigation did not outweigh these factors.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed