Campbell v Safra [2006] EWHC 819 (QB) (12 April 2006)

Campbell v Safra [2006] EWHC 819 (QB) (12 April 2006)

The Claimant failed to provide evidence that the Defendant was responsible for the publication of the allegedly defamatory statements, and the pleadings did not disclose the necessary elements for the tort of inducing breach of contract. The Defendant was therefore entitled to summary judgment on both claims.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 819
Parties
Claimant: Lady Colin Campbell; Defendant: Lily Safra
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil (defamation and Economic Tort) / Application for Summary Judgment And/or Strike Out
Outcome
Summary judgment for the Defendant; both claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
Libel, Inducement to Breach of Contract, Summary Judgment, Qualified Privilege, Fair Comment, Justification, Publication, Mental Element in Economic Torts
Defamation Tort Law Contract Law Libel Inducement to Breach of Contract Summary Judgment Qualified Privilege Fair Comment +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lady Colin Campbell

Claimant

Lily Safra

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (defamation and Economic Tort) / Application for Summary Judgment And/or Strike Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant was responsible for publication of allegedly defamatory statements about the Claimant
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant induced a breach of contract between the Claimant and her publisher

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant failed to provide evidence that the Defendant was responsible for the publication of the allegedly defamatory statements, and the pleadings did not disclose the necessary elements for the tort of inducing breach of contract. The Defendant was therefore entitled to summary judgment on both claims.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment for the Defendant; both claims dismissed.

Orders

  • The Defendant is entitled to summary judgment on the claim in libel.
  • The Defendant is entitled to summary judgment on the claim for inducement to breach of contract.