Field v British Coal Corporation

Field v British Coal Corporation

The claimant did not have actual or constructive knowledge of a significant injury before November 2003, as he reasonably attributed his symptoms to wax and infections and was not put on enquiry by the information available to him. Therefore, the claim was brought within the limitation period under section 11 of the Limitation Act 1980.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: John Field; Respondent/defendant: British Coal Corporation (Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment on Preliminary Limitation Issue
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Constructive Knowledge, Personal Injury Claims, Statutory Interpretation
Tort Personal Injury Statutory Limitation Limitation of Actions Constructive Knowledge Personal Injury Claims Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Field

Appellant/claimant

British Coal Corporation (Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform)

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment on Preliminary Limitation Issue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's claim for personal injury was time-barred under section 11 of the Limitation Act 1980
  2. 2 Whether the claimant had actual or constructive knowledge of his injury more than three years before issuing proceedings under section 14 of the Limitation Act 1980
  3. 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to allow the claim to proceed out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant did not have actual or constructive knowledge of a significant injury before November 2003, as he reasonably attributed his symptoms to wax and infections and was not put on enquiry by the information available to him. Therefore, the claim was brought within the limitation period under section 11 of the Limitation Act 1980.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The claim is not time-barred under section 11 of the Limitation Act 1980.