The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association & Ors v Box & Ors
The court has jurisdiction, under its inherent powers, to entertain the claimants’ application for a declaration on the Aggregation Point, even though the 1930 Act does not itself confer a statutory right to such a declaration prior to liability being established. The application meets the principles for declaratory relief as there is a real and present dispute, the parties are affected, and the declaration would serve a useful purpose in the litigation.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association; Claimant: Yorkshire Cancer Research (formerly Yorkshire Cancer Research Campaign); Claimant: British Heart Foundation; Claimant: The National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty; Defendant: Linda Mary Box; Defendant: Julian Sanderson Gill; Defendant: Dixon Coles and Gill; Defendant: HDI Global Specialty SE (formerly International Insurance Company of Hannover SE)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Insurance/indemnity/probate / Interlocutory Application for Declaration on Court's Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application allowed; declaration made that the court has jurisdiction to consider the Aggregation Point.
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Rights Against Insurers, Declaratory Relief, Aggregation of Insurance Claims, Statutory Assignment, Court Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Claimant
Yorkshire Cancer Research (formerly Yorkshire Cancer Research Campaign)
Claimant
British Heart Foundation
Claimant
The National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
Claimant
Linda Mary Box
Defendant
Julian Sanderson Gill
Defendant
Dixon Coles and Gill
Defendant
HDI Global Specialty SE (formerly International Insurance Company of Hannover SE)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Insurance/indemnity/probate / Interlocutory Application for Declaration on Court's Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to make a declaration on the Aggregation Point under the Third Party (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 before liability is established against the insured.
- 2 Whether the claimants, as third parties, can seek declaratory relief regarding insurance coverage prior to judgment or agreement on liability.
- 3 Whether the court's inherent jurisdiction allows for a declaration in the absence of statutory entitlement under the 1930 Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction, under its inherent powers, to entertain the claimants’ application for a declaration on the Aggregation Point, even though the 1930 Act does not itself confer a statutory right to such a declaration prior to liability being established. The application meets the principles for declaratory relief as there is a real and present dispute, the parties are affected, and the declaration would serve a useful purpose in the litigation.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; declaration made that the court has jurisdiction to consider the Aggregation Point.
Orders
- The court declares it has jurisdiction to make a declaration in respect of the Aggregation Point in this claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment